Monday, November 17, 2014

KNOWING ELVIRA NABIULLINA, THE NUMBER ONE OF THE RUSSIAN CENTRAL BANK UNDER SIEGE

Profile: Elvira Nabiullina, Woman at Center of Russia's Ruble Collapse

Sergei Porter / VedomostiElvira Nabiullina has come under pressure as Russia's ruble currency has plummeted.
Reaching the climax of a personal attack on Russia's Central Bank chairwoman Elvira Nabiullina in a debate in the State Duma early last week, Communist deputy Vyacheslav Tetyokin did not hold back.
Nabiullina, he said, was “the most expensive woman in the history of our country.”
Tetyokin was incensed by the more than $70 billion of foreign currency reserves the Central Bank has burned through defending the ruble this year as it has been battered by Western sanctions on Moscow and a steadily sliding oil price.
In a much-anticipated monetary policy switch, the Central Bank announced last Monday that it was ceasing interventions on currency market except in the case of threats to financial stability: meaning the ruble was now fully free-floating.
Criticism of 51-year-old Nabiullina, an economist born near the Ural Mountains with a reported passion for French poetry, has stepped up in recent weeks as the Russian currency's dramatic volatility prompts uncomfortable recollections of the country's traumatic 1998 default.
The ruble has weakened over 30 percent against the U.S. dollar since the beginning of the year and, in a crash that caused U.S. dollar supplies to dry up at retail banks, plunged 10 percent in 48 hours to a record low of 48.6 versus the greenback on Nov. 7.

Close to Putin 

For the six years prior to her appointment as Central Bank chief last year, Nabiullina worked alongside President Vladimir Putin.
After serving as Economic Development Minister between 2007 and 2012, Nabiullina, who has spent most of her career in government service, followed Putin to the Kremlin as an economic adviser. She was a surprise choice for the top Central Bank position, which was vacated in 2013 by the long-serving Sergei Ignatyev after 11 years in the post.
Economists and analysts expressed concern at the time that Nabiullina was too linked to Putin to be independent, and the concerns still linger over a year later.
“They mishandled the transition to the free float quite badly,” said one Western banker in Moscow who requested anonymity because he was not authorized to speak to the media.
“I don't completely blame the Central Bank management team. … It may have been a political requirement,” he said.
Putin largely refrained from commenting publicly on the ruble's troubles as devaluation gathered pace in October, but said several times that Russia would not “mindlessly burn through” its reserves, which now amount to about $420 billion.
The move to a free float means the Central Bank is no longer required to sell reserves to curb the ruble's decline.
Foreign currency reserves are now one of the few instruments left available to the Kremlin to mitigate the effects of an economy teetering on the brink of recession. A cease-fire between government forces and pro-Russian separatists in Ukraine appears to be on the verge of collapse, raising fears of further sanctions from the U.S. and the European Union.

A New Kudrin? 

Nabiullina's position in debates within the government over inflation, which has soared to over 8 percent this year, and the falling ruble has prompted some analysts to draw comparisons between her and former Finance Minister Alexei Kudrin.
A key figure during his tenure as Finance Minister between 2000 and 2011, Kudrin was admired amongst investors and his international counterparts for his fiscal conservatism.
Kudrin resigned following public disagreements with then-President Dmitry Medvedev over policy, in particular defense spending.
Nabiullina worked closely with Kudrin, her ministerial colleague, during the 2008 financial crisis to develop an emergency lending plan to limit the damage to the economy.
Many of Nabiullina's decisions at the Central Bank, including her campaign to tighten oversight in the financial sector and allow the currency to free float, have been praised by economists.
“From an economic and public relations point of view the authorities have done everything correctly,” the influential Vedomosti business daily wrote in an editorial on Nov. 11, the day after the Central Bank implemented the free float.
Others said however that the comparison with Kudrin was only true up to a point.
“She is not afraid to stand up to many interest groups,” said one prominent Russian economist who requested anonymity to speak freely.
“But she cannot argue with Putin and she will not resign over a policy issue.”

'Hard, Precise and Demanding' 

Born to a working family in Ufa, the capital of the Bashkortostan republic, in 1963, Nabiullina is married to the rector of Moscow's Higher School of Economics, Yaroslav Kuzminov.
She enjoys poetry and her favorite authors include Anna Akhmatova and Paul Verlaine, according to a Bloomberg report last year just before her accession to the Central Bank.
Aside from Duma deputies like Tetyokin, who tinge their allegations of incompetence with misogyny, Nabiullina has faced more sustained opposition from hardline Kremlin figures represented by Putin adviser Sergei Glazyev.
Rumored to have lost out to Nabiullina in the race for the Central Bank job, Glazyev has publicly called for the imposition of capital controls and for the Central Bank to impose a fixed interest rate. Nabiullina has dismissed these proposals.
“Nabiullina is hard, precise and demanding,” said Anton Danilov-Danilyan, deputy head of business lobbying group Business Russia (Delovaya Rossiya) and a student acquaintance of Nabiullina.
“She is an economic liberal,” said Danilov-Danilyan, who worked alongside Nabiullina on the board of directors at Sberbank, the biggest of Russia's state banks. “She has always been like that and always will be.”

CZECH REPUBLIC: 25 YEARS OF THE VELVET REVOLUTION

25 YEARS OF THE VELVET REVOLUTION

Praga festeja los 25 años de la revolución de terciopelo que hizo caer el régimen comunista checoslovaco

Sunday, November 16, 2014

QATAR AND THE ISLAMIC TERRORISM

Terror financiers are living freely in Qatar, US discloses

The American official in charge of terror sanctions has revealed that two senior al-Qaeda money men have escaped punishment in the Gulf state

BY ROBERT MENDICK, THE DAILY TELEGRAPH, NOVEMBER 16.


Two of al-Qaeda’s most senior financiers are living with impunity in Qatar despite being on a worldwide terrorism blacklist, the American official in charge of sanctions has disclosed.
The revelation casts serious doubt on the Gulf state’s insistence that it does not support terrorists, including jihadists in Syria and Iraq.
It will also add to growing calls on the British Government to put pressure on Qatar to crack down on terrorist financiers following the murder of two British aid workers in Syria.
Qatar has huge investments in Britain — including such landmark businesses as the Shard skyscraper — and yet at the same time is apparently condoning jihadist financiers operating out of the Gulf.
The two Qataris — Khalifa Muhammad Turki al-Subaiy and Abd al-Rahman bin Umayr al-Nuaymi — are living in Doha, the country’s capital, and are free to go as they please, according to David Cohen, the US Treasury under-secretary for terrorism and financial intelligence.

Mr Cohen has accused Qatar and its near neighbour Kuwait of being “permissive jurisdictions for terrorist financing” but until now the fate of a number of money men — identified as Specially Designated Global Terrorists by the US government — has not been known.
Qatar has refused to say what has happened to al-Subaiy, al-Nuaymi and others on US and United Nations terrorism sanctions lists.
The Telegraph has asked over a number of weeks about the status of the men and Qatar has refused to answer.
But during a question and answer session following a keynote speech in Washington, a transcript of which has been obtained by The Telegraph, Mr Cohen said: “There are US- and UN-designated terrorist financiers in Qatar that have not been acted against under Qatari law. There’s Khalifa al-Subaiy — and more recently, Abd al-Nuaymi, who we designated last December, the UN designated in August.” Mr Cohen added that both men were residents in Qatar.
The US Treasury said it could not disclose further classified information on the men.
Both al-Nuaymi and al-Subaiy are understood to be well-connected to Qatar’s ruling elite.
They are also accused of raising millions of dollars for al-Qaeda and other jihadist groups. Al-Qaeda and Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (Isil) have announced a deal to fight together in Iraq and in Syria.
Al-Subaiy, 49, a former Qatari Central Bank employee, was blacklisted as a terrorist fundraiser as long ago as 2008 but still appears to be heavily involved in a jihadist network.
According to the official American report, al-Subaiy was identified as “a Qatar-based terrorist financier and facilitator who has provided financial support to, and acted on behalf of, al-Qaeda senior leadership, including senior al-Qaeda leader Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM) prior to KSM’s capture in March 2003”.
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed has been named as the “principal architect of the 9/11 attacks” and is being held in Guantánamo Bay.
He had lived freely in Qatar for a number of years in the Nineties despite being wanted even at that stage by the US for terror offences.
Al-Nuaymi, a former president of the Qatar Football Association, is accused of being one of the world’s most prolific terrorist fundraisers, accused of sending more than £1.25 million a month to al-Qaeda jihadists in Iraq and hundreds of thousands of pounds to Syria.
He was designated a terrorist in the US last December and added to a British sanctions list only in October this year.
It is alleged that both men’s links to senior figures in Qatar has helped keep them out of jail in recent years and off Qatar’s own terrorist sanctions list. The country introduced a designated terrorist list but to date not a single individual has been put on it.
A US diplomatic cable sent in May 2008 hinted at a dispute between the Qatari intelligence agencies and the country’s then all-powerful prime minister Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber al-Thani — known as HBJ for short — over the handling of al-Subaiy, who at the time was serving time in jail after being convicted of terrorist offences in Bahrain.
In the cable sent by the US’s then chargé d’affaires Michael Ratney, ahead of a visit by Henry Paulson, the treasury secretary at the time, he wrote: “HBJ was involved very early on, but to the consternation, we believe, of Qatar’s security agencies.
“If you raise the issue on this visit, it should be limited to thanking the Qataris for their cooperation on the case …
“We believe any more detailed discussion of the case should be done through the Qatari attorney general and intelligence service, and not with HBJ.”
Al-Nuaymi, 60, was, according to reports a decade ago, praised by Qatar’s former emir who thanked him for introducing the emir to “men of Islamist political thought” including a sheikh who has been described as a mentor to Osama bin Laden.
The Telegraph’s Stop the Funding of Terror campaign, has highlighted how Gulf states — including Qatar — have turned a blind eye to terrorist financiers operating within their midst.
The US treasury believes countries such as Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates have clamped down on jihadist financiers in recent months whereas Qatar and Kuwait have failed to tackle the issue — much to the frustration of Washington.
The US has attempted to keep Qatar at arm’s length. It is wary about the Qatari government’s overt support for Hamas and also for the Muslim Brotherhood, an Islamist group that it insists is non-violent but has been blamed for stirring sectarian violence in Libya and elsewhere.
Mr Cohen, who leads the US treasury team tackling Qatar and Kuwait head on, recently returned from a trip to the region, clearly unhappy at the lack of progress.
In his speech, Mr Cohen said he was “concerned” in “ensuring that people who’ve been designated by the US and by the UN are disrupted and unable to continue their fundraising activities”.
Mr Cohen added: “There’s more work to do both in Qatar and Kuwait.
“We have been deeply engaged with both countries for a number of years. We have seen others make really substantial progress in combating terrorist financing.
“And we’re going to continue to work as closely as possible with our partners in the Gulf on this issue.”
Dr David Weinberg, a senior fellow at the Washington-based Foundation for Defense of Democracies, a think tank investigating Qatar’s links to terror funding, said Mr Cohen’s recent speech had “damned Qatar and Kuwait with faint praise”.
He added: “The notion that he would return from meetings in Doha only to declare that Nuaymi and Subaiy are enjoying legal impunity there proves meaningful cooperation behind the scenes is virtually nonexistent.
“It suggests maybe the Qataris are quite happy being a permissive jurisdiction for terrorist finance.
“It may also bear noting that the previous emir of Qatar has reportedly praised Nuaymi as his old friend.
“Arrests, indictments and convictions are only one dimension of whether Qatar is taking the fight against terrorism seriously, but historically it is one of several dimensions in which the [ruling] al-Thani family has miserably failed the test. Doha’s token participation in air strikes against the Islamic State was intended to show that they are on our side in the fight against terror, but these sorts of revelations really put to the test whether Qatar can be considered a reliable friend and ally.”
Qatar has strongly denied funding Isil and other terrorist organisations. In his only broadcast interview the current emir, Tamim bin Hamad al-Thani, said “We don’t fund extremists” and explained that terrorism was “not acceptable in our culture and our religion”.
But he went on to say: “There are differences between some countries, of who are the terrorists and who are the maybe Islamist groups, but we don’t consider them as terrorists.”
Britain’s close relationship with Qatar has come under scrutiny with questions raised in Parliament over why the Treasury’s sanctions list contains fewer Qatar-based individuals than the US list given the fact that the two countries are supposed to share intelligence information closely.
Al-Nuaymi was placed on the US sanctions list and identified as a terrorist at the end of 2013 but it took Britain until October this year — after the discrepancy was highlighted by The Telegraph to do the same.
Al-Nuaymi has denied any wrongdoing and insisted he is being persecuted because of his outspoken criticism of US policy in the region
.

CARI: 26 Y 27/11, SEMINARIO ANUAL SOBRE EL MAPA DE LOS CONFLICTOS

Miércoles 26-11 y jueves 27-11, 9.00 horas
Continuando con la práctica iniciada en su trigésimo aniversario, el Consejo Argentino para las Relaciones Internacionales invita a su seminario anual, desde donde convoca a un grupo de expertos para analizar la evolución de temas de gran relevancia en la agenda internacional


Primera Sesión: El mapa del conflicto en un mundo crecientemente anárquico

9.00 horas
Apertura
Adalberto Rodríguez Giavarini

9.15 horas
El mapa general de los conflictos
Julio A. Hang

Sudamérica: ¿Una región de baja densidad de conflictos relevantes?
Félix Peña

Ucrania, sus vecinos y la OTAN
Marcelo Montes

Preguntas

11.00 horas
Break

11.15 horas
México y Centroamérica. Narcotráfico y crimen organizado
Juan Belikow

África: Conflictos por recursos, religión y territorio
Gladys Lechini

Los conflictos del Mar de China
Jorge Malena

Preguntas

What next for independence movements in Europe? | openDemocracy

What next for independence movements in Europe? | openDemocracy